Janine Starks looks at the various shades of grey in a green-blue zoning conundrum and sees nothing but red-tape and trouble

Green-blue trapped

This is a really tough one. The ability to sell a home on green-blue land (Technical Category 3 or ‘TC3’) could be very difficult. It all hinges on the actions of a number of groups of professionals; EQC, insurers, bankers, real-estate agents and lawyers. They all have the potential to increase the barriers to a sale.

The ‘TC3’ label could cause problems across the board, for re-selling. While the category only applies to houses with foundation damage, this is a bit of a farce. Even if you have no damage, your land may suffer “moderate to significant liquefaction” in a new event. That has got to be a big red flag to future buyers. The resale issue is not going to be isolated to the hard-hit areas, when we face a decade of seismic activity.

I hear so many people say “I’m on TC3 land, but we’re really lucky our foundations are fine.” I think that’s misguided. It is possible that a good number of TC3 home owners will end up worse off financially than those in the Red Zones – especially those who are not getting new foundations. The erosion of equity is a real risk.

Here’s my thoughts on how the professions involved could impact the situation: … see link below for the full article and discussion

http://www.interest.co.nz/personal-finance/57918/janine-starks-looks-various-shades-grey-green-blue-zoning-conundrum-and-sees

This entry was posted in TC3 Land. Bookmark the permalink.
US